End-to-End (e2e) Testing with AI: Cursor + Playwright MCP or Kane CLI?

Should Cursor drive Playwright MCP for your end-to-end (E2E) tests, or hand off to Kane CLI? Same goal. Very different bill. 👉Write and Run your end-to-end (E2E) Tests Now: https://www.testmuai.com/kane-cli/ With Cursor + Playwright MCP, every step pours a page snapshot into the agent’s context. The agent writes selectors and test code, you maintain those selectors when the UI changes, and the agent that built the feature grades its own work. With Cursor + Kane CLI, there are no selectors. You describe the flow in plain English. Kane CLI autoheals and pushes through up to 50 steps, assertions check every step (not just the last screen), and every run uploads a video, step trace and a share link. Already invested in Playwright? Keep it. Kane CLI exports native Playwright code in one command. Get started: $ npm i -g @testmuai/kane-cli Then point Cursor at:- testmuai.com/kane-cli/agents.md Cursor writes the code. Kane CLI checks it. #E2ETesting #PlaywrightMCP #KaneCLI #Cursor #AITesting